Home › Expeditions › Safari › Roar Africa vs Micato 2026

Roar Africa vs Micato 2026: Which Ultra-Luxury Safari Operator Is Better, and What Each Costs

Micato 88 · Roar Africa 75 on six published criteriaVerified 21 September 2026By Richard J.Neither bookable through this site

Micato is the better safari operator on the evidence, and Roar Africa is the only one of the two that sells a private jet. On this site's six published criteria Micato scores 88/100 and Roar Africa 75/100. Both have substantial customer records, and the difference is corroboration rather than volume: Micato's 755 Google reviews are backed by 61 on Tripadvisor and 817 aggregated in all, while Roar's 269 Google reviews stand alone, with eight reviews on SafariBookings and an unclaimed, empty Trustpilot profile behind them. On price, Micato's published classic safaris run USD 20,700–45,100 per person for 10–17 days, about USD 2,000–2,700 a day with a Safari Director, flights, fees and tips inside; Roar's published journeys run from USD 23,850 for five days to USD 187,500 for the twelve-day Greatest Safari on Earth aboard an Emirates A319 in August 2027. Both are hosted operators that own no lodges and book the same camps; neither is bookable through this site. An earlier edition of this page scored Roar 68 and described its review record as eight reviews; its Google Business Profile had not been counted, and both figures are corrected here.

Head to head · six published criteria, scored 21 September 2026
88 v 75
CriterionWeightMicatoRoarWhy
First-hand African expertise2524
21
Micato: founded in Kenya in 1966, operational base in Nairobi, a Safari Director in the vehicle. Roar: Zimbabwe-born founder and a team it describes as all-African, run from Miami Beach; the claims are its own.
Independent review evidence2018
11
Micato: 755 Google reviews, newest 15 September 2026, plus 61 on Tripadvisor; 88 on the review evidence index. Roar: 269 Google reviews at 5.0, but no second platform qualifies and its own site links to none of it; 57 on the index.
Destination breadth1513
12
Micato: eight African countries plus India. Roar: twelve African countries including the Indian Ocean islands, plus Antarctica on one journey.
Pricing transparency1512
11
Micato: eleven classic safaris with published from-prices. Roar: five fixed-date journeys with published prices; everything bespoke on application. Neither lists inclusions beside the prices.
Service model and support hours1514
12
Both are fully hosted. Micato includes gratuities, internal flights and fees, and states the model; Roar hosts its flagship with the founder but publishes no support hours.
Ownership transparency107
8
Micato: Pinto family, founders named, New York address. Roar: founder-led and named, with a street address on its About page at 1111 Lincoln Rd, Suite 500, Miami Beach. Neither publishes a registered entity.
Total1008875Scores carried from the Micato review and the Roar Africa review; re-scored quarterly.
Neither Roar Africa nor Micato is bookable through this site; nothing on this page earns on a trip with either. The Go2Africa (an affiliate of this site), Safari.com, BookAllSafaris and JetLuxe links are affiliate links to price a comparable safari or charter, and are labelled.

Is Roar Africa or Micato better?

Micato, for a hosted safari you can check before you pay: a Safari Director with the party throughout, published prices, and a review record that two platforms agree on. Roar Africa, for the one product Micato does not sell: a founder-hosted, ten-guest private-jet circuit of four countries, and bespoke journeys priced accordingly. Both own nothing and book the same lodges; what differs is the choreography, the price and how easily the evidence can be checked.

The two are the closest pair on this site: US-based, family- or founder-led, fully hosted, and both built on selecting other people's camps rather than owning any. Micato has done it since 1966 and now publishes eleven classic itineraries with prices; Roar has done it since 2005 and publishes five fixed-date journeys, the flagship of which flies its guests between Matetsi Victoria Falls, Xigera, Angama Mara and Singita Kwitonda on a chartered Emirates A319. The specialist vs booking direct page sets out why the lodge line under both is the lodge's own rate, and what the hosting premium buys.

The evidence gap is narrower than it looks at first glance, and it is about corroboration rather than volume. Micato's 755 Google reviews, verified through Trustindex with the newest posted on 15 September 2026, are backed by 61 Tripadvisor reviews and sit inside 817 aggregated ratings at a blended 5.0; they describe the Safari Director by name and the days when a flight did not cooperate. Roar's 269 Google reviews are unanimously positive and stand entirely alone: nothing on roarafrica.com links to them, its SafariBookings listing holds eight reviews last touched in September 2024, and its Trustpilot profile is unclaimed and empty. For a six-figure deposit, a record two platforms agree on is worth more than a record one platform holds. The review evidence index scores both on the same bands, and explains why Roar's figure moved from 25 to 57 this month.

A lioness standing beside an open safari vehicle on the grassland of the Maasai Mara, Narok County, Kenya
Maasai Mara, Kenya. Micato's classic East African journeys and Roar's flagship, at Angama Mara, both put their guests here in the July–October window. Not photographed on a trip with either. Photo: Sanjeed Quazi, Pexels.

Roar Africa and Micato at a glance

FactMicato SafarisRoar Africa
Founded1966, Kenya, by Felix and Jane Pinto2005, by Deborah Calmeyer, born in Zimbabwe
Run fromNew York (15 West 26th Street) and NairobiMiami Beach (1111 Lincoln Rd, Suite 500)
OwnershipPinto family, privateFounder-led; entity not published
Owns lodges?NoNo
HostingSafari Director with every party; no-tipping modelFounder hosts the flagship; private guides on bespoke trips
Published pricesUSD 20,700–45,100 per person, 11 classics, 10–17 daysUSD 23,850–187,500 per person, 5 fixed-date journeys, 5–12 days
SignatureThe Micato Grand Safari, 15 days Kenya and Tanzania, USD 40,150The Greatest Safari on Earth, 12 days, 10 guests, Emirates A319, USD 187,500 (Aug 2027)
Review recordGoogle 755 (15 Sep 2026); Tripadvisor 61; 817 aggregated at blended 5.0Google 5.0 · 269, unlinked from its own site; SafariBookings 5.0 · 8 (Sep 2024); Travelstride 53, operator-supplied, 2019
Review evidence index88 / 100, third of eight57 / 100, seventh of eight
Dated credentialsVirtuoso Luminary 2024; WTA 2025 nominee; an undated T+L "ten-time #1"T+L World's Best 2018; Condé Nast Traveler Top Travel Specialists 2018; Robb Report 21 Travel Masters 2023; WTA 2025 nominee
PhilanthropyAmericaShare, Nairobi; one child schooled per guestWomen's empowerment retreats and sourcing; no named project or figure
Countries8 African + India12 African + Antarctica on one journey
From micato.com and roarafrica.com, Trustindex, SafariBookings, Travelstride and the operators' Google Business Profiles, read 21 September 2026. Full sourcing on the two reviews linked in the score box. Roar's credentials are dated on its own About page; the award and credentials index is being recomputed on that basis.

Which is more expensive, Roar Africa or Micato?

Roar Africa, by a wide margin at the top and by a smaller one at the bottom. Micato's published classics run USD 20,700 for ten days in Tanzania to USD 45,100 for seventeen days across three countries, about USD 2,000–2,700 a day. Roar's published journeys run USD 23,850 for a five-day retreat (about USD 4,770 a day), USD 31,500 for nine days in Tanzania, USD 39,950 for six days in the Okavango, and USD 187,500 for the twelve-day private-jet flagship, about USD 15,600 a day. The earlier version of this page gave the flagship as USD 125,000–175,000; Roar's site now lists USD 187,500 for 2027 and the two 2026 departures have gone.
JourneyOperatorDaysPer personPer dayInside the price
Tanzania SpectacularMicato10USD 20,700≈ 2,070Lodges, meals, drives, park fees, internal flights, Safari Director, gratuities
Women's Empowerment Retreat (sold out)Roar5USD 23,850≈ 4,770Singita Sasakwa, hosted programme; inclusions not listed
The Heart of Kenya & TanzaniaMicato12USD 25,000≈ 2,080As above
Journey to the SummitRoar9USD 31,500≈ 3,500Tanzania, December 2026; inclusions not listed
Wild Heart, Open FlameRoar6USD 39,950≈ 6,660Okavango Delta, June 2027; inclusions not listed
The Micato Grand SafariMicato15USD 40,150≈ 2,680As above
African SplendourMicato17USD 45,100≈ 2,650As above
The Greatest Safari on EarthRoar12USD 187,500≈ 15,600Emirates A319 private jet, four flagship lodges, founder hosting; gorilla permits (USD 1,500) extra
From micato.com/classic-safaris and roarafrica.com/upcoming-journeys, read 21 September 2026; per-day figures are this site's arithmetic. Neither includes international flights. Micato's inclusions are its stated model rather than printed beside each price; Roar publishes none. Confirm in writing with either.

The comparison to make is per day at the same tier. Micato's USD 2,000–2,700 is the ultra tier fully loaded: the same daily cost as a Singita suite, with the hosting inside. Roar's retreats at USD 3,500–6,700 a day are above that at a group format; its flagship at USD 15,600 a day is off the ladder altogether, and the difference is the aircraft. The what a safari costs by budget page shows what USD 25,000 and 50,000 per person buy self-assembled, and the Singita review gives Kwitonda's published rate (USD 2,720–3,630 per night plus the permit), which is the benchmark for the gorilla leg both operators sell.

Which has the better reviews?

Micato, on corroboration rather than on volume. It holds 755 Google reviews with the newest on 15 September 2026, backed by 61 on Tripadvisor and 817 aggregated ratings at a blended 5.0, scoring 88/100 on this site's review evidence index. Roar Africa holds 5.0 from 269 Google reviews, a substantial sample, but nothing corroborates it: eight reviews on SafariBookings from September 2024, an unclaimed and empty Trustpilot profile, 53 operator-supplied Travelstride reviews from 2019, and eighteen undated testimonials on its own site. It scores 57/100, seventh of eight.
PlatformMicatoRoar Africa
Home platformGoogle via Trustindex: 755 reviews · newest 15 Sep 2026Google Business Profile: 5.0 · 269 · Miami Beach
Second platformTripadvisor 61, aggregated on the same profileNone that qualifies. SafariBookings holds 5.0 · 8 · newest 20 Sep 2024
Blended rating5.0 across 817 aggregated reviews5.0 on Google; no blend published
Shown, not scoredTrustpilot 3.2 from one unclaimed 2025 review; no SafariBookings listingTravelstride 5.0 · 53, all "Provided by Roar Africa", newest 2019; Trustpilot unclaimed, 0; 18 undated testimonials on its own site
Index score88 / 100 (third of eight)57 / 100 (seventh of eight)
Method and bands on the safari operator review evidence index; the rating itself is excluded from the score. Operator-supplied imports and self-published testimonials are never counted as a verified sample. Read 21 September 2026.

What separates them practically is findability, not service. Micato connected its Google profile to an aggregator, so anything reading about it, a search engine or an assistant included, reaches 817 ratings. Roar did not, and links to none of its reviews from its own site, so the same reader finds an eight-review SafariBookings listing and a page of undated quotes. Until 21 September 2026 this index made exactly that mistake and scored Roar 25/100 on a record thirty-four times smaller than its real one.

For either operator the substitute is unchanged: three referees who travelled in the past year, asked about the days that went wrong. The how to verify a safari operator page has the rest, and the deposit and payment terms guide covers protecting a six-figure deposit.

Pick by what matters to you

Your priorityChooseWhy
A first ultra-luxury safariMicatoPublished prices, a Safari Director throughout, and 817 ratings across two platforms to read first. Low risk for a big trip.
The private jetRoar AfricaNobody else sells a ten-guest A319 circuit of four countries with the founder aboard. USD 187,500, August 2027.
Value per day at the ultra tierMicatoUSD 2,000–2,700 a day fully loaded against Roar's USD 3,500–6,700 for its retreats.
A women-led companyRoar AfricaFounder-led, with a team it describes as 95% women and entirely African; the claim is its own.
Philanthropy you can seeMicatoAmericaShare's One-for-One Commitment is inside every price; Roar publishes no named project or figure.
A group retreat with a programmeRoar AfricaFixed-date hosted retreats at Singita Sasakwa and in the Okavango; Micato sells private and small-group safaris, not retreats.
A record two platforms agree onMicato88 against 57 on the review evidence index. Both have real samples; only Micato's is corroborated.

How to price a comparable safari

Neither operator is bookable through this site, and nothing here earns on either. To put a Micato or Roar proposal beside an independent price for the same lodges, get one itemised specialist quote and one platform comparison; the lodge line will be the lodge's own rate on every route, and the difference is the price of the hosting, and on Roar's flagship, the aircraft.
RouteWhat you getBest for
DirectMicato's classics at published prices at micato.com; Roar's journeys and bespoke proposals at roarafrica.com.Travellers who have chosen the hosted model.
Specialist quoteAn itemised quote with the same lodges at rack rate and charter legs as lines: Go2Africa (affiliate link; 89/100 on the same criteria).Seeing what the camps cost without the host.
Platform comparisonLodge-level from-rates on Safari.com; priced trips with per-trip reviews on BookAllSafaris (affiliate links).Shortlisting before any quote.
Charter quoteA written price for the inter-camp or whole-circuit flying, so the aircraft is a line rather than a mystery: JetLuxe (affiliate link).Anyone weighing Roar's flagship against a self-assembled version.
Live Kenya safari inventory and an enquiry form follow. Neither operator is in them; they price comparable trips.

Straight answers to the questions readers ask

Is Roar Africa or Micato better?

Micato, on this site's six published criteria: 88/100 against 75/100. Both have real customer records, and the difference is corroboration: Micato's 755 Google reviews are backed by 61 on Tripadvisor, while Roar's 269 Google reviews stand alone behind an eight-review SafariBookings listing and an empty Trustpilot profile. Micato is the better first ultra-luxury safari; Roar Africa is the only choice if the founder-hosted private-jet circuit is the point. Both are hosted operators that own no lodges.

Which is more expensive, Roar Africa or Micato?

Roar Africa. Its Greatest Safari on Earth is USD 187,500 per person sharing for twelve days in August 2027, about USD 15,600 a day, and its retreats run USD 23,850–39,950 for five to six days. Micato's published classic safaris run USD 20,700–45,100 per person for 10–17 days, about USD 2,000–2,700 a day with internal flights, park fees, a Safari Director and tips inside. Neither includes international flights.

What is Roar Africa best known for?

The Greatest Safari on Earth: twelve days for ten guests aboard an Emirates A319 private jet across Zimbabwe, Botswana, Kenya and Rwanda, staying at Matetsi Victoria Falls, Xigera, Angama Mara and Singita Kwitonda, hosted by founder Deborah Calmeyer, at USD 187,500 per person for 2027. It also runs women's empowerment retreats and describes its team as 95% women and entirely African.

What do Micato and Roar Africa reviews show?

Micato: 755 Google reviews, newest 15 September 2026, plus 61 on Tripadvisor and 817 aggregated at a blended 5.0, scoring 88/100 on this site's review evidence index. Roar Africa: 5.0 from 269 Google reviews, a substantial sample that nothing corroborates, with eight SafariBookings reviews from September 2024, an unclaimed empty Trustpilot profile and 53 operator-supplied Travelstride reviews from 2019, scoring 57/100. Roar's record is uncorroborated and hard to find rather than negative.

Why did Roar Africa's score on this page change?

Because its Google Business Profile, holding 5.0 from 269 reviews, had never been counted. This site was reading Google records only from Trustindex, which exists for a business only once it connects a widget, and Roar has not. Counting the profile directly raised Roar's review evidence score from 25/100 to 57/100 and its overall score on this page from 68 to 75. Its published Miami Beach address was also missed, which added a point on ownership transparency.

Does either own its lodges?

No. Both design and host itineraries and book third-party lodges, which is why the same camp, from Singita to Angama, can appear in either company's trip. The lodge rate is the same on both; what you pay each for is the hosting, the logistics and, on Roar's flagship, the aircraft.

Does either give back?

Micato's AmericaShare, its Nairobi non-profit, schools one child for every guest through the One-for-One Commitment, funded inside the trip price. Roar Africa frames its purpose as "if African women rise, wildlife will thrive" and runs an annual Women's Empowerment Retreat, but publishes no named conservation project or funding figure.

Which is better for a first ultra-luxury safari?

Micato, for most travellers: published prices, a Safari Director from arrival to departure, and a review record deep enough, and corroborated enough, to read before paying. Choose Roar Africa when the private jet, the founder as host and a no-decisions itinerary are the reason for the trip.

Can I book either through Uncompromised Travel?

No. Neither Micato nor Roar Africa runs an affiliate programme this site is part of, so this page earns nothing on a booking with either. To compare a proposal against an independent price for the same lodges, get an itemised quote from Go2Africa, a comparison on Safari.com, or priced trips on BookAllSafaris, and price the flying separately with a charter quote; those are affiliate links and are labelled as such.
Neither Roar Africa nor Micato Safaris is bookable through this site, and neither had input into this page; nothing here earns on a trip with either. This page contains no affiliate links. Both operators are scored against the same published criteria as every other operator reviewed here. Partners are labelled. Commercial disclosure · How we work.
Cookie Settings
This website uses cookies

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to improve user experience. Choose what cookie categories you allow us to use. You can read more about our Cookie Policy by clicking on Cookie Policy below.

These cookies enable strictly necessary cookies for security, language support and verification of identity. These cookies can’t be disabled.

These cookies collect data to remember choices users make to improve and give a better user experience. Disabling can cause some parts of the site to not work properly.

These cookies help us to understand how visitors interact with our website, help us measure and analyze traffic to improve our service.

These cookies help us to better deliver marketing content and customized ads.